❤ Comparison of a play and a story

Comparing any play and work at once, there can be a lot of disagreements and disputes, whether the actors correctly conveyed their character or not, whether there were differences from the performance and many other factors. In any play, we can see the emotions that the actors convey on stage, which is an important factor, since during the reading we ourselves present the picture that the author wanted to convey.

I can say that the performance is really brilliant, it's nice to look at the actors and their professional approach to the action, but at the same time you can notice, a departure from some of the main themes of the novel, which resulted from the focus of the first half of the plot on the Creation instead of the creator. We can note the strong metaphors that the performance conveyed: the origin of a person, his rights, the ethical component of scientific research. Turning to the story, you can catch what the actors were able to convey plot: Dr. Victor Frankenstein creates a Monster by breathing life into a body created from the parts of various deceased people. However, horrified by the ugliness of his creation, he leaves it to its fate. A lonely, ugly, childishly innocent monster expects trust and love from the world, but everywhere it encounters only anger, cruelty and hatred. Finally desperate, the Monster vows to find its creator and take revenge on him in the most terrible way.

In conclusion, I can say that both the work and the performance deserve the interest and attention of many. 💘💙💚💛

https://youtu.be/uZjhMf4VaLA

https://youtu.be/ucOhQh8sCGA